AMD FirePro W9100 vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of AMD FirePro W9100 with 16 GB GDDR5 and 2,816 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms AMD FirePro W9100 by 1,114.6% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

AMD FirePro W9100

5.4

AMD FirePro W9100

5.4
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

16 ГБ
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

320.0 GB/s 96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

512 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 22.27 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

5.238 TFLOPS
🔥 +27,105% 1,425.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

2.619 TFLOPS
🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

2,816
🔥 512

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

GCN 2.0 Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 1,354

Boost Clock

No
🔥 1,392

Memory Clock

1,250
🔥 +20% 1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

275 W
🔥 -83% 47 W

Recommended PSU

600 W
🔥 -67% 200 W

Power Connector

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

176
🔥 32

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

1024 KB
🔥 1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

March 26, 2014 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x S-Video
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying