AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs XFX R9 FURY Pro Liquid Cooled

Comparison of AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 with 128 GB HBM2e and 13,312 cores vs XFX R9 FURY Pro Liquid Cooled with 4 GB HBM and 3,584 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 outperforms XFX R9 FURY Pro Liquid Cooled by 619.8% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

50.9

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

50.9
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

XFX R9 FURY Pro Liquid Cooled

7.1

XFX R9 FURY Pro Liquid Cooled

7.1

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Benchmarks Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +3,100% 128 ГБ
4 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM2e HBM

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 3.28 TB/s
512.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

8,192 бит 4,096 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +4,952% 362.1 TFLOPS
7.168 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +531% 45.26 TFLOPS
7.168 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +10,003% 45.26 TFLOPS
0.448 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +271% 13,312
3,584

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

CDNA 2.0 GCN 3.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 1,000
No

Boost Clock

🔥 1,700
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +220% 1,600
500

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

500 W
🔥 -45% 275 W

Recommended PSU

900 W
🔥 -33% 600 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin 2x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +271% 832
224

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 +700% 16 MB
2 MB

Benchmarks

llama.cpp, llama-2-7b-Q4_0

63.9 tokens/s

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Nov. 8, 2021 Sept. 21, 2015

Display Outputs

No outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying