ASUS R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

Comparison of ASUS R9 FURY X with 4 GB HBM and 4,096 cores vs NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB outperforms ASUS R9 FURY X by 231.5% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASUS R9 FURY X

7.8

ASUS R9 FURY X

7.8
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ
🔥 +1,900% 80 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM HBM2e

Memory Bandwidth

512.0 GB/s
🔥 2.04 TB/s

Memory Bus Width

4,096 бит 5,120 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

8.602 TFLOPS
🔥 +806% 77.97 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No
🔥 311.84 TFLOPS

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No
🔥 155.92

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

8.602 TFLOPS
🔥 +127% 19.49 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.5376000000000001 TFLOPS
🔥 +1,713% 9.746 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

4,096
🔥 +69% 6,912

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

GCN 3.0 Ampere

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 108

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 8.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 1,155

Boost Clock

No
🔥 1,410

Memory Clock

500
🔥 +219% 1,593

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -31% 275 W
400 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -25% 600 W
800 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

256
🔥 +69% 432

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

2 MB
🔥 +1,900% 40 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot
🔥 SXM Module

Release Date

June 24, 2015 Aug. 11, 2022

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying