ASUS R9 Nano White vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of ASUS R9 Nano White with 4 GB HBM and 4,096 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms ASUS R9 Nano White by 763.47% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASUS R9 Nano White

7.6

ASUS R9 Nano White

7.6
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

512.0 GB/s 96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

4,096 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

8.192 TFLOPS
🔥 +172% 22.27 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

8.192 TFLOPS
🔥 +17,295% 1,425.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.512 TFLOPS
🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

4,096
🔥 512

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

GCN 3.0 Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 1,354

Boost Clock

No
🔥 1,392

Memory Clock

500
🔥 +200% 1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

175 W
🔥 -73% 47 W

Recommended PSU

450 W
🔥 -56% 200 W

Power Connector

1x 8-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

256
🔥 32

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

2 MB
🔥 +51,100% 1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Nov. 1, 2015 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying