ASUS TUF GTX 1650 GAMING GDDR6 vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Comparison of ASUS TUF GTX 1650 GAMING GDDR6 with 4 GB GDDR6 and 896 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASUS TUF GTX 1650 GAMING GDDR6 outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 12.27% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASUS TUF GTX 1650 GAMING GDDR6

2.5

ASUS TUF GTX 1650 GAMING GDDR6

2.5
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

192.0 GB/s 124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

5.699 TFLOPS
🔥 +8% 6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

2.849 TFLOPS
🔥 +8% 3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.08904000000000001 TFLOPS
🔥 +763% 0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +17% 896
768

RT Cores

No
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Turing Generation 12.7

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 14
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

7.5 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,410
🔥 +42% 2,000

Boost Clock

1,590
🔥 +26% 2,000

Memory Clock

1,500
🔥 +29% 1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

90 W
🔥 -17% 75 W

Recommended PSU

250 W 250 W

Power Connector

1x 6-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +75% 56
32

ROP

No
🔥 6

L2 Cache

1024 KB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

June 18, 2020 Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying