ASUS XG Station vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of ASUS XG Station with 256 GB GDDR3 and 32 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms ASUS XG Station by 259.07% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASUS XG Station

18.3

ASUS XG Station

18.3
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

256 ГБ
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR3 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

22.40 GB/s 96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 22.27 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

76.16 TFLOPS
🔥 +1,771% 1,425.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

No
🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

32
🔥 +1,500% 512

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Tesla Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

4
🔥 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 1.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

1.1
🔥 6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 1,354

Boost Clock

No
🔥 1,392

Memory Clock

700
🔥 +115% 1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

47 W 47 W

Recommended PSU

200 W 200 W

Power Connector

None None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

16
🔥 +100% 32

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

32 KB
🔥 +3,100% 1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Single-slot

Release Date

April 17, 2007 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

2x DVI
1x S-Video
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying