Barco MXRT-2600 vs NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

Comparison of Barco MXRT-2600 with 2 GB DDR3 and 320 cores vs NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB outperforms Barco MXRT-2600 by 6.85% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Barco MXRT-2600

24.2

Barco MXRT-2600

24.2
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

2 ГБ
🔥 +3,900% 80 ГБ

Memory Type

DDR3 HBM2e

Memory Bandwidth

28.80 GB/s
🔥 2.04 TB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 5,120 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 77.97 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No
🔥 311.84 TFLOPS

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No
🔥 155.92

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

435.2 TFLOPS
🔥 19.49 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.0272 TFLOPS
🔥 +35,731% 9.746 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

320
🔥 +2,060% 6,912

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

GCN 1.0 Ampere

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 108

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 8.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

630
🔥 +83% 1,155

Boost Clock

680
🔥 +107% 1,410

Memory Clock

900
🔥 +77% 1,593

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -94% 26 W
400 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -75% 200 W
800 W

Power Connector

None None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

20
🔥 +2,060% 432

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

256 KB
🔥 40 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot
🔥 SXM Module

Release Date

Aug. 12, 2014 Aug. 11, 2022

Display Outputs

2x DisplayPort 1.2
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying