Barco MXRT-2600 vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Comparison of Barco MXRT-2600 with 2 GB DDR3 and 320 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Barco MXRT-2600 outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 1,001.36% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Barco MXRT-2600

24.2

Barco MXRT-2600

24.2
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

2 ГБ
🔥 +100% 4 ГБ

Memory Type

DDR3 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

28.80 GB/s 124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

435.2 TFLOPS
🔥 3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.0272 TFLOPS
🔥 +2,724% 0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

320
🔥 +140% 768

RT Cores

No
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

GCN 1.0 Generation 12.7

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

630
🔥 +217% 2,000

Boost Clock

680
🔥 +194% 2,000

Memory Clock

900
🔥 +115% 1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -65% 26 W
75 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -20% 200 W
250 W

Power Connector

None None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

20
🔥 +60% 32

ROP

No
🔥 6

L2 Cache

256 KB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Aug. 12, 2014 Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

2x DisplayPort 1.2
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying