AMD Radeon Instinct MI355X vs Barco MXRT-6700

Comparison of AMD Radeon Instinct MI355X with 288 GB HBM3e and 16,384 cores vs Barco MXRT-6700 with 8 GB GDDR5 and 1,792 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

AMD Radeon Instinct MI355X outperforms Barco MXRT-6700 by 2,675.07% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

AMD Radeon Instinct MI355X

93.5

AMD Radeon Instinct MI355X

93.5
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Barco MXRT-6700

3.4

Barco MXRT-6700

3.4

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Benchmarks Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +3,500% 288 ГБ
8 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM3e GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 8.19 TB/s
160.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

8,192 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +16,064% 629.1 TFLOPS
3.892 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +1,921% 78.64 TFLOPS
3.892 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +32,222% 78.64 TFLOPS
0.24330000000000002 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +814% 16,384
1,792

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

CDNA 4.0 GCN 4.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +40% 1,000
713

Boost Clock

🔥 +121% 2,400
1,086

Memory Clock

🔥 +60% 2,000
1,250

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

1400 W
🔥 -95% 75 W

Recommended PSU

1800 W
🔥 -86% 250 W

Power Connector

None None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +814% 1,024
112

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 +700% 16 MB
2 MB

Benchmarks

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (mxfp4)

10 129 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-405b (mxfp4)

252.4 tokens/s

Additional

Slots

OAM Module Single-slot

Release Date

July 15, 2025 Nov. 18, 2016

Display Outputs

No outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying