ColorFire R9 295X2 vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of ColorFire R9 295X2 with 4 GB GDDR5 and 2,816 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms ColorFire R9 295X2 by 1,322.29% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ColorFire R9 295X2

4.6

ColorFire R9 295X2

4.6
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ ×2 (8 ГБ)
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

320.0 GB/s ×2 (640 GB/s) 96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

512 бит ×2 (1024 бит) 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 22.27 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

5.733 TFLOPS
🔥 +24,756% 1,425.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.7167 TFLOPS
🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

2,816 ×2 (5632)
🔥 512

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

GCN 2.0 Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 1,354

Boost Clock

No
🔥 1,392

Memory Clock

1,250
🔥 +20% 1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

500 W
🔥 -91% 47 W

Recommended PSU

900 W
🔥 -78% 200 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

176 ×2 (352)
🔥 32

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

1024 KB
🔥 1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

April 29, 2014 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying