Colorful iGame GTX 560 Ti Kudan vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of Colorful iGame GTX 560 Ti Kudan with 1 GB GDDR5 and 384 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms Colorful iGame GTX 560 Ti Kudan by 4,431.72% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Colorful iGame GTX 560 Ti Kudan

1.5

Colorful iGame GTX 560 Ti Kudan

1.5
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

1 ГБ
🔥 +300% 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

144.0 GB/s 96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 22.27 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

1.551 TFLOPS
🔥 +91,776% 1,425.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.1293 TFLOPS
🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

384
🔥 +33% 512

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Fermi 2.0 Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

8
🔥 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

2.1
🔥 6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 1,354

Boost Clock

No
🔥 1,392

Memory Clock

1,125
🔥 +34% 1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

170 W
🔥 -72% 47 W

Recommended PSU

450 W
🔥 -56% 200 W

Power Connector

2x 6-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

64
🔥 32

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

512 KB
🔥 +100% 1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Triple-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Jan. 25, 2011 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying