Colorful IGame GTX 950 Flame Warrior X vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of Colorful IGame GTX 950 Flame Warrior X with 2 GB GDDR5 and 768 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms Colorful IGame GTX 950 Flame Warrior X by 3,788.17% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Colorful IGame GTX 950 Flame Warrior X

1.7

Colorful IGame GTX 950 Flame Warrior X

1.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

2 ГБ
🔥 +100% 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

112.0 GB/s 96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 22.27 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

2.1 TFLOPS
🔥 +67,757% 1,425.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.06562 TFLOPS
🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

768
🔥 512

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Maxwell 2.0 Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

5.2
🔥 6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,178
🔥 +15% 1,354

Boost Clock

1,367
🔥 +2% 1,392

Memory Clock

1,750
🔥 1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

90 W
🔥 -48% 47 W

Recommended PSU

250 W
🔥 -20% 200 W

Power Connector

1x 6-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

48
🔥 32

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

1024 KB
🔥 1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Sept. 9, 2015 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.2

2x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.2
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying