Colorful Tomahawk GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

Comparison of Colorful Tomahawk GTX 1650 SUPER with 4 GB GDDR6 and 1,280 cores vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB outperforms Colorful Tomahawk GTX 1650 SUPER by 713.65% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Colorful Tomahawk GTX 1650 SUPER

3.2

Colorful Tomahawk GTX 1650 SUPER

3.2
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ
🔥 +1,900% 80 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 HBM2e

Memory Bandwidth

192.0 GB/s
🔥 1.94 TB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 5,120 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

8.832 TFLOPS
🔥 +783% 77.97 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No
🔥 311.84 TFLOPS

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No
🔥 155.92

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

4.416 TFLOPS
🔥 +341% 19.49 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.138 TFLOPS
🔥 +6,962% 9.746 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

1,280
🔥 +440% 6,912

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Turing Ampere

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

20
🔥 +440% 108

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

7.5
🔥 8.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,530
🔥 1,065

Boost Clock

1,725
🔥 1,410

Memory Clock

1,500
🔥 +1% 1,512

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -67% 100 W
300 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -57% 300 W
700 W

Power Connector

1x 6-pin 8-pin EPS

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

80
🔥 +440% 432

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

1024 KB
🔥 80 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Nov. 22, 2019 June 28, 2021

Display Outputs

1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying