EIZO MED-X4900 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

Comparison of EIZO MED-X4900 with 1 GB GDDR5 and 480 cores vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

EIZO MED-X4900 outperforms NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB by 36.64% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

EIZO MED-X4900

35.0

EIZO MED-X4900

35.0
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

1 ГБ
🔥 +7,900% 80 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 HBM2e

Memory Bandwidth

64.00 GB/s
🔥 1.94 TB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 5,120 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 77.97 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No
🔥 311.84 TFLOPS

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No
🔥 155.92

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

768.0 TFLOPS
🔥 19.49 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

No
🔥 9.746 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

480
🔥 +1,340% 6,912

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

TeraScale 2 Ampere

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 108

PCIe Version

PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 8.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 1,065

Boost Clock

No
🔥 1,410

Memory Clock

1,000
🔥 +51% 1,512

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -75% 75 W
300 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -64% 250 W
700 W

Power Connector

None 8-pin EPS

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

24
🔥 +1,700% 432

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

256 KB
🔥 80 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Nov. 1, 2011 June 28, 2021

Display Outputs

1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying