EIZO MED-X7000 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

Comparison of EIZO MED-X7000 with 4 GB GDDR5 and 1,280 cores vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB outperforms EIZO MED-X7000 by 1,004.74% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

EIZO MED-X7000

2.3

EIZO MED-X7000

2.3
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ
🔥 +1,900% 80 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 HBM2e

Memory Bandwidth

153.6 GB/s
🔥 1.94 TB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 5,120 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 77.97 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No
🔥 311.84 TFLOPS

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No
🔥 155.92

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

2.432 TFLOPS
🔥 +701% 19.49 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.152 TFLOPS
🔥 +6,312% 9.746 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

1,280
🔥 +440% 6,912

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

GCN 1.0 Ampere

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 108

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 8.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 1,065

Boost Clock

No
🔥 1,410

Memory Clock

1,200
🔥 +26% 1,512

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -50% 150 W
300 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -36% 450 W
700 W

Power Connector

1x 6-pin 8-pin EPS

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

80
🔥 +440% 432

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

512 KB
🔥 80 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

June 13, 2012 June 28, 2021

Display Outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.2
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying