EIZO MED-X90 vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of EIZO MED-X90 with 8 GB GDDR5 and 1,792 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms EIZO MED-X90 by 2,040.39% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

EIZO MED-X90

3.1

EIZO MED-X90

3.1
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

8 ГБ
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

160.0 GB/s 96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

3.297 TFLOPS
🔥 +575% 22.27 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

3.297 TFLOPS
🔥 +43,121% 1,425.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.2061 TFLOPS
🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

1,792
🔥 512

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

GCN 3.0 Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 1,354

Boost Clock

No
🔥 1,392

Memory Clock

1,250
🔥 +20% 1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

150 W
🔥 -69% 47 W

Recommended PSU

450 W
🔥 -56% 200 W

Power Connector

1x 6-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

112
🔥 32

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

512 KB
🔥 +100% 1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Aug. 12, 2014 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.2
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying