EIZO MED-XN51LP vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of EIZO MED-XN51LP with 4 GB GDDR5 and 640 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms EIZO MED-XN51LP by 3,858.43% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

EIZO MED-XN51LP

1.7

EIZO MED-XN51LP

1.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

80.19 GB/s 96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

29.6 TFLOPS
🔥 22.27 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

1.894 TFLOPS
🔥 +75,138% 1,425.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.0592 TFLOPS
🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

640
🔥 512

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Pascal Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

5
🔥 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

6.1 6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,266
🔥 +7% 1,354

Boost Clock

1,480
🔥 1,392

Memory Clock

1,253
🔥 +20% 1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

47 W 47 W

Recommended PSU

200 W 200 W

Power Connector

None None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

40
🔥 32

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

1024 KB
🔥 1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Feb. 7, 2017 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying