EIZO MED-XN72 vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of EIZO MED-XN72 with 5 GB GDDR5X and 1,280 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms EIZO MED-XN72 by 2,019.68% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

EIZO MED-XN72

3.1

EIZO MED-XN72

3.1
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

5 ГБ
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5X GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

200.2 GB/s 96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

160 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

59.72 TFLOPS
🔥 22.27 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

3.822 TFLOPS
🔥 +37,184% 1,425.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.1194 TFLOPS
🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

1,280
🔥 512

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Pascal Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

10
🔥 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

6.1 6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,000
🔥 +35% 1,354

Boost Clock

1,493
🔥 1,392

Memory Clock

1,251
🔥 +20% 1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

75 W
🔥 -37% 47 W

Recommended PSU

250 W
🔥 -20% 200 W

Power Connector

None None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

80
🔥 32

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

1280 KB
🔥 1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Single-slot

Release Date

June 10, 2019 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.4a
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying