EIZO MED-XN72 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

Comparison of EIZO MED-XN72 with 5 GB GDDR5X and 1,280 cores vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB outperforms EIZO MED-XN72 by 726.77% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

EIZO MED-XN72

3.1

EIZO MED-XN72

3.1
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

5 ГБ
🔥 +1,500% 80 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5X HBM2e

Memory Bandwidth

200.2 GB/s
🔥 1.94 TB/s

Memory Bus Width

160 бит 5,120 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

59.72 TFLOPS
🔥 +31% 77.97 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No
🔥 311.84 TFLOPS

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No
🔥 155.92

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

3.822 TFLOPS
🔥 +410% 19.49 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.1194 TFLOPS
🔥 +8,062% 9.746 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

1,280
🔥 +440% 6,912

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Pascal Ampere

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

10
🔥 +980% 108

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

6.1
🔥 8.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,000
🔥 +6% 1,065

Boost Clock

1,493
🔥 1,410

Memory Clock

1,251
🔥 +21% 1,512

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -75% 75 W
300 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -64% 250 W
700 W

Power Connector

None 8-pin EPS

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

80
🔥 +440% 432

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

1280 KB
🔥 80 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

June 10, 2019 June 28, 2021

Display Outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.4a
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying