EIZO MED-XN91 vs NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

Comparison of EIZO MED-XN91 with 8 GB GDDR5 and 1,792 cores vs NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB outperforms EIZO MED-XN91 by 496.54% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

EIZO MED-XN91

4.3

EIZO MED-XN91

4.3
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

8 ГБ
🔥 +900% 80 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 HBM2e

Memory Bandwidth

243.3 GB/s
🔥 2.04 TB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 5,120 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

82.88 TFLOPS
🔥 77.97 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No
🔥 311.84 TFLOPS

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No
🔥 155.92

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

5.304 TFLOPS
🔥 +267% 19.49 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.1658 TFLOPS
🔥 +5,778% 9.746 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

1,792
🔥 +286% 6,912

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Pascal Ampere

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

14
🔥 +671% 108

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

6.1
🔥 8.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,202
🔥 1,155

Boost Clock

1,480
🔥 1,410

Memory Clock

1,901
🔥 1,593

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -74% 105 W
400 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -62% 300 W
800 W

Power Connector

1x 6-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

112
🔥 +286% 432

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

2 MB
🔥 +1,900% 40 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot
🔥 SXM Module

Release Date

Feb. 6, 2017 Aug. 11, 2022

Display Outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.4a
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying