EIZO MED-XN91 vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Comparison of EIZO MED-XN91 with 8 GB GDDR5 and 1,792 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

EIZO MED-XN91 outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 97.27% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

EIZO MED-XN91

4.3

EIZO MED-XN91

4.3
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

8 ГБ
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

243.3 GB/s 124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

82.88 TFLOPS
🔥 6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

5.304 TFLOPS
🔥 3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.1658 TFLOPS
🔥 +363% 0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

1,792
🔥 768

RT Cores

No
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Pascal Generation 12.7

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

14 No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

6.1 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,202
🔥 +66% 2,000

Boost Clock

1,480
🔥 +35% 2,000

Memory Clock

1,901
🔥 +2% 1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

105 W
🔥 -29% 75 W

Recommended PSU

300 W
🔥 -17% 250 W

Power Connector

1x 6-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

112
🔥 32

ROP

No
🔥 6

L2 Cache

2 MB
🔥 +100% 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Feb. 6, 2017 Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.4a
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying