EIZO MED-XN92 vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of EIZO MED-XN92 with 8 GB GDDR6 and 2,304 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms EIZO MED-XN92 by 1,056.87% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

EIZO MED-XN92

5.7

EIZO MED-XN92

5.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

8 ГБ
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

416.0 GB/s 96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

14.24 TFLOPS
🔥 +56% 22.27 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

7.119 TFLOPS
🔥 +19,917% 1,425.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.2225 TFLOPS
🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

2,304
🔥 512

RT Cores

36 No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Turing Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

36
🔥 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 7.5
6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,005
🔥 +35% 1,354

Boost Clock

1,545
🔥 1,392

Memory Clock

1,625
🔥 1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

160 W
🔥 -71% 47 W

Recommended PSU

450 W
🔥 -56% 200 W

Power Connector

1x 8-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

144
🔥 32

ROP

36 No

L2 Cache

4 MB
🔥 +25,500% 1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Nov. 13, 2018 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying