EIZO MED-XN92 vs MAXSUN Arc B580 Milestone

Comparison of EIZO MED-XN92 with 8 GB GDDR6 and 2,304 cores vs MAXSUN Arc B580 Milestone with 12 GB GDDR6 and 2,560 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

MAXSUN Arc B580 Milestone outperforms EIZO MED-XN92 by 55.99% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

EIZO MED-XN92

5.7

EIZO MED-XN92

5.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

MAXSUN Arc B580 Milestone

8.9

MAXSUN Arc B580 Milestone

8.9

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

8 ГБ
🔥 +50% 12 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

416.0 GB/s 456.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 192 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

14.24 TFLOPS
🔥 +105% 29.18 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

7.119 TFLOPS
🔥 +105% 14.59 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.2225 TFLOPS
🔥 +720% 1.824 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

2,304
🔥 +11% 2,560

RT Cores

36
🔥 20

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Turing Xe2

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

36 No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

7.5 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,005
🔥 +166% 2,670

Boost Clock

1,545
🔥 +84% 2,850

Memory Clock

1,625
🔥 +46% 2,375

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -16% 160 W
190 W

Recommended PSU

450 W 450 W

Power Connector

1x 8-pin 1x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

144
🔥 +11% 160

ROP

36
🔥 20

L2 Cache

4 MB
🔥 +350% 18 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Nov. 13, 2018 Dec. 13, 2024

Display Outputs

3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
1x HDMI 2.1a
3x DisplayPort 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying