EIZO MED-XN92 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

Comparison of EIZO MED-XN92 with 8 GB GDDR6 and 2,304 cores vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB outperforms EIZO MED-XN92 by 351.23% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

EIZO MED-XN92

5.7

EIZO MED-XN92

5.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

8 ГБ
🔥 +900% 80 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 HBM2e

Memory Bandwidth

416.0 GB/s
🔥 1.94 TB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 5,120 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

14.24 TFLOPS
🔥 +448% 77.97 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No
🔥 311.84 TFLOPS

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No
🔥 155.92

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

7.119 TFLOPS
🔥 +174% 19.49 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.2225 TFLOPS
🔥 +4,280% 9.746 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

2,304
🔥 +200% 6,912

RT Cores

36 No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Turing Ampere

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

36
🔥 +200% 108

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

7.5
🔥 8.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,005
🔥 +6% 1,065

Boost Clock

1,545
🔥 1,410

Memory Clock

1,625
🔥 1,512

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -47% 160 W
300 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -36% 450 W
700 W

Power Connector

1x 8-pin 8-pin EPS

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

144
🔥 +200% 432

ROP

36 No

L2 Cache

4 MB
🔥 +1,900% 80 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Nov. 13, 2018 June 28, 2021

Display Outputs

3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying