EIZO MED-XN92 vs NVIDIA CMP 70HX

Comparison of EIZO MED-XN92 with 8 GB GDDR6 and 2,304 cores vs NVIDIA CMP 70HX with 8 GB GDDR6X and 3,840 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA CMP 70HX outperforms EIZO MED-XN92 by 35.04% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

EIZO MED-XN92

5.7

EIZO MED-XN92

5.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA CMP 70HX

7.7

NVIDIA CMP 70HX

7.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

8 ГБ
🔥 8 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR6X

Memory Bandwidth

416.0 GB/s 608.3 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

14.24 TFLOPS
🔥 10.71 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

7.119 TFLOPS
🔥 +50% 10.71 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.2225 TFLOPS
🔥 0.1674 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

2,304
🔥 +67% 3,840

RT Cores

36
🔥 30

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Turing Ampere

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

36
🔥 30

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x4

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

7.5
🔥 8.6

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,005
🔥 +36% 1,365

Boost Clock

1,545
🔥 1,395

Memory Clock

1,625
🔥 1,188

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

160 W unknown

Recommended PSU

450 W
🔥 -56% 200 W

Power Connector

1x 8-pin 1x 12-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

144
🔥 120

ROP

36
🔥 30

L2 Cache

4 MB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Nov. 13, 2018 July 16, 2021

Display Outputs

3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying