EIZO MED-XN92 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

Comparison of EIZO MED-XN92 with 8 GB GDDR6 and 2,304 cores vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER with 16 GB GDDR7 and 8,960 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER outperforms EIZO MED-XN92 by 251.94% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

EIZO MED-XN92

5.7

EIZO MED-XN92

5.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

20.0

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

20.0

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

8 ГБ
🔥 +100% 16 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR7

Memory Bandwidth

416.0 GB/s 896.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

14.24 TFLOPS
🔥 +209% 43.94 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

7.119 TFLOPS
🔥 +517% 43.94 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.2225 TFLOPS
🔥 +209% 0.6866 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

2,304
🔥 +289% 8,960

RT Cores

36
🔥 +94% 70

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Turing Blackwell 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

36
🔥 +94% 70

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 5.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

7.5
🔥 12.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,005
🔥 +128% 2,295

Boost Clock

1,545
🔥 +59% 2,452

Memory Clock

1,625
🔥 +8% 1,750

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -54% 160 W
350 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -40% 450 W
750 W

Power Connector

1x 8-pin 1x 16-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

144
🔥 +94% 280

ROP

36
🔥 +94% 70

L2 Cache

4 MB
🔥 +1,100% 48 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Nov. 13, 2018 July 17, 2025

Display Outputs

3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b

Renting is cheaper than buying