EIZO MED-XN92 vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Comparison of EIZO MED-XN92 with 8 GB GDDR6 and 2,304 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

EIZO MED-XN92 outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 158.18% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

EIZO MED-XN92

5.7

EIZO MED-XN92

5.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

8 ГБ
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

416.0 GB/s 124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

14.24 TFLOPS
🔥 6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

7.119 TFLOPS
🔥 3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.2225 TFLOPS
🔥 +245% 0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

2,304
🔥 768

RT Cores

36
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Turing Generation 12.7

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

36 No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

7.5 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,005
🔥 +99% 2,000

Boost Clock

1,545
🔥 +29% 2,000

Memory Clock

1,625
🔥 +19% 1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

160 W
🔥 -53% 75 W

Recommended PSU

450 W
🔥 -44% 250 W

Power Connector

1x 8-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

144
🔥 32

ROP

36
🔥 6

L2 Cache

4 MB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Nov. 13, 2018 Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying