EVGA RTX 4090 FTW3 Prototype vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Comparison of EVGA RTX 4090 FTW3 Prototype with 24 GB GDDR6X and 16,384 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

EVGA RTX 4090 FTW3 Prototype outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 1,357.27% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

EVGA RTX 4090 FTW3 Prototype

32.1

EVGA RTX 4090 FTW3 Prototype

32.1
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

24 ГБ
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6X GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 1.01 TB/s
124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

384 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

82.58 TFLOPS
🔥 6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

82.58 TFLOPS
🔥 3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

No
🔥 0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

16,384
🔥 768

RT Cores

128
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Ada Lovelace Generation 12.7

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

128 No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

8.9 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

2,235
🔥 2,000

Boost Clock

2,520
🔥 2,000

Memory Clock

1,313
🔥 +48% 1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

450 W
🔥 -83% 75 W

Recommended PSU

850 W
🔥 -71% 250 W

Power Connector

1x 16-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

512
🔥 32

ROP

128
🔥 6

L2 Cache

72 MB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Quad-slot Single-slot

Release Date

No Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying