GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB vs NVIDIA Tesla X2070

Comparison of GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB with 32 GB GDDR7 and 21,760 cores vs NVIDIA Tesla X2070 with 6 GB GDDR5 and 448 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB

46.5

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB

46.5
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Tesla X2070

NVIDIA Tesla X2070

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Benchmarks Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +433% 32 ГБ
6 GB

Memory Type

GDDR7 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 1.79 TB/s
177.4 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

512 бит 384 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 115.5 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +9,808% 115.5 TFLOPS
1.1657 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +210% 1.805 TFLOPS
0.5828 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +4,757% 21,760
448

RT Cores

🔥 170
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Blackwell 2.0 Fermi

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 +1,114% 170
14

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 12.0
2.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,017
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,655
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +89% 1,750
924

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

575 W
🔥 -61% 225 W

Recommended PSU

950 W
🔥 -42% 550 W

Power Connector

1x 16-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +1,114% 680
56

ROP

🔥 170
No

L2 Cache

🔥 96 MB
768 KB

Benchmarks

llama.cpp, llama 7B Q4_0

14.3 tokens/s

llama.cpp, llama-2-7b-Q4_0

14.3 tokens/s

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot MXM Module

Release Date

Jan. 30, 2025 July 25, 2011

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying