GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB vs ZOTAC GTX 760 OC

Comparison of GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB with 32 GB GDDR7 and 21,760 cores vs ZOTAC GTX 760 OC with 2 GB GDDR5 and 1,152 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB outperforms ZOTAC GTX 760 OC by 1,946.7% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB

46.5

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB

46.5
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

ZOTAC GTX 760 OC

2.3

ZOTAC GTX 760 OC

2.3

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +1,500% 32 ГБ
2 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR7 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 1.79 TB/s
192.3 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

512 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 115.5 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +4,359% 115.5 TFLOPS
2.59 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +1,573% 1.805 TFLOPS
0.10790000000000001 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +1,789% 21,760
1,152

RT Cores

🔥 170
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Blackwell 2.0 Kepler

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 170
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 12.0
3.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +91% 2,017
1,058

Boost Clock

🔥 +136% 2,655
1,124

Memory Clock

🔥 +17% 1,750
1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

575 W
🔥 -70% 170 W

Recommended PSU

950 W
🔥 -53% 450 W

Power Connector

1x 16-pin 2x 6-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +608% 680
96

ROP

🔥 170
No

L2 Cache

🔥 96 MB
512 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Jan. 30, 2025 Sept. 14, 2013

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying