GIGABYTE R7 250 OC 2 GB Rev. 4 vs NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

Comparison of GIGABYTE R7 250 OC 2 GB Rev. 4 with 2 GB DDR3 and 384 cores vs NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

GIGABYTE R7 250 OC 2 GB Rev. 4 outperforms NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB by 34.8% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

GIGABYTE R7 250 OC 2 GB Rev. 4

34.9

GIGABYTE R7 250 OC 2 GB Rev. 4

34.9
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

2 ГБ
🔥 +3,900% 80 ГБ

Memory Type

DDR3 HBM2e

Memory Bandwidth

28.80 GB/s
🔥 2.04 TB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 5,120 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 77.97 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No
🔥 311.84 TFLOPS

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No
🔥 155.92

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

844.8 TFLOPS
🔥 19.49 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.0528 TFLOPS
🔥 +18,358% 9.746 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

384
🔥 +1,700% 6,912

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

GCN 1.0 Ampere

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 108

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 8.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,050
🔥 +10% 1,155

Boost Clock

1,100
🔥 +28% 1,410

Memory Clock

900
🔥 +77% 1,593

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -84% 65 W
400 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -69% 250 W
800 W

Power Connector

None None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

24
🔥 +1,700% 432

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

256 KB
🔥 40 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot
🔥 SXM Module

Release Date

Oct. 8, 2013 Aug. 11, 2022

Display Outputs

1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying