GIGABYTE R7 260X OC 2 GB vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of GIGABYTE R7 260X OC 2 GB with 2 GB GDDR5 and 896 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms GIGABYTE R7 260X OC 2 GB by 3,811.31% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

GIGABYTE R7 260X OC 2 GB

1.7

GIGABYTE R7 260X OC 2 GB

1.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

2 ГБ
🔥 +100% 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

104.0 GB/s 96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 22.27 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

2.129 TFLOPS
🔥 +66,833% 1,425.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.1331 TFLOPS
🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

896
🔥 512

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

GCN 2.0 Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 1,354

Boost Clock

No
🔥 1,392

Memory Clock

1,625
🔥 1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

115 W
🔥 -59% 47 W

Recommended PSU

300 W
🔥 -33% 200 W

Power Connector

1x 6-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

56
🔥 32

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

256 KB
🔥 +300% 1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Oct. 9, 2013 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying