GIGABYTE R9 290 Battlefield 4 vs NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

Comparison of GIGABYTE R9 290 Battlefield 4 with 4 GB GDDR5 and 2,560 cores vs NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB outperforms GIGABYTE R9 290 Battlefield 4 by 514.96% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

GIGABYTE R9 290 Battlefield 4

4.2

GIGABYTE R9 290 Battlefield 4

4.2
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ
🔥 +1,900% 80 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 HBM2e

Memory Bandwidth

320.0 GB/s
🔥 2.04 TB/s

Memory Bus Width

512 бит 5,120 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 77.97 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No
🔥 311.84 TFLOPS

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No
🔥 155.92

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

4.849 TFLOPS
🔥 +302% 19.49 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.6061 TFLOPS
🔥 +1,508% 9.746 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

2,560
🔥 +170% 6,912

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

GCN 2.0 Ampere

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 108

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 8.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 1,155

Boost Clock

No
🔥 1,410

Memory Clock

1,250
🔥 +27% 1,593

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -31% 275 W
400 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -25% 600 W
800 W

Power Connector

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

160
🔥 +170% 432

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

1024 KB
🔥 40 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot
🔥 SXM Module

Release Date

Dec. 1, 2013 Aug. 11, 2022

Display Outputs

2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying