GIGABYTE RTX 3050 EAGLE OC 6 GB vs Sapphire NITRO+ RX 7900 XTX Vapor-X

Comparison of GIGABYTE RTX 3050 EAGLE OC 6 GB with 6 GB GDDR6 and 2,304 cores vs Sapphire NITRO+ RX 7900 XTX Vapor-X with 24 GB GDDR6 and 6,144 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Sapphire NITRO+ RX 7900 XTX Vapor-X outperforms GIGABYTE RTX 3050 EAGLE OC 6 GB by 592.1% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

GIGABYTE RTX 3050 EAGLE OC 6 GB

4.1

GIGABYTE RTX 3050 EAGLE OC 6 GB

4.1
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Sapphire NITRO+ RX 7900 XTX Vapor-X

28.0

Sapphire NITRO+ RX 7900 XTX Vapor-X

28.0

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

6 ГБ
🔥 +300% 24 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

168.0 GB/s 960.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

96 бит 384 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

6.912 TFLOPS
🔥 +1,805% 131.7 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

6.912 TFLOPS
🔥 +853% 65.86 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.108 TFLOPS
🔥 +1,806% 2.058 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

2,304
🔥 +167% 6,144

RT Cores

18
🔥 +433% 96

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Ampere RDNA 3.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 18
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

8.6 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,042
🔥 +103% 2,119

Boost Clock

1,500
🔥 +79% 2,680

Memory Clock

1,750
🔥 +43% 2,500

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -83% 70 W
420 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -69% 250 W
800 W

Power Connector

None 3x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

72
🔥 +433% 384

ROP

18
🔥 +433% 96

L2 Cache

2 MB
🔥 +200% 6 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Quad-slot

Release Date

Feb. 2, 2024 Nov. 3, 2022

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1
1x USB Type-C

2x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying