Inno3D GTX 1650 SUPER COMPACT vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of Inno3D GTX 1650 SUPER COMPACT with 4 GB GDDR6 and 1,280 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms Inno3D GTX 1650 SUPER COMPACT by 1,986.03% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Inno3D GTX 1650 SUPER COMPACT

3.2

Inno3D GTX 1650 SUPER COMPACT

3.2
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

192.0 GB/s 96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

8.832 TFLOPS
🔥 +152% 22.27 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

4.416 TFLOPS
🔥 +32,169% 1,425.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.138 TFLOPS
🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

1,280
🔥 512

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Turing Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

20
🔥 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 7.5
6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,530
🔥 1,354

Boost Clock

1,725
🔥 1,392

Memory Clock

1,500
🔥 1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

100 W
🔥 -53% 47 W

Recommended PSU

300 W
🔥 -33% 200 W

Power Connector

1x 6-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

80
🔥 32

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

1024 KB
🔥 1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Nov. 22, 2019 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying