Inno3D GTX TITAN Z vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Comparison of Inno3D GTX TITAN Z with 6 GB GDDR5 and 2,880 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Inno3D GTX TITAN Z outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView by 104.09% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Inno3D GTX TITAN Z

4.5

Inno3D GTX TITAN Z

4.5
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

6 ГБ ×2 (12 ГБ)
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

336.0 GB/s ×2 (672 GB/s) 124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

384 бит ×2 (768 бит) 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

5.046 TFLOPS
🔥 3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

1.682 TFLOPS
🔥 0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

2,880 ×2 (5760)
🔥 768

RT Cores

No
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Kepler Generation 12.7

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

3.5 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

705
🔥 +184% 2,000

Boost Clock

876
🔥 +128% 2,000

Memory Clock

1,750
🔥 +11% 1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

375 W
🔥 -80% 75 W

Recommended PSU

750 W
🔥 -67% 250 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

240 ×2 (480)
🔥 32

ROP

No
🔥 6

L2 Cache

1536 KB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Triple-slot Single-slot

Release Date

May 28, 2014 Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying