Inno3D P102-100 Twin X2 vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of Inno3D P102-100 Twin X2 with 5 GB GDDR5X and 3,200 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms Inno3D P102-100 Twin X2 by 856.48% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Inno3D P102-100 Twin X2

6.9

Inno3D P102-100 Twin X2

6.9
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

5 ГБ
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5X GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

440.3 GB/s 96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

320 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

168.3 TFLOPS
🔥 22.27 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

10.77 TFLOPS
🔥 +13,131% 1,425.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.3366 TFLOPS
🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

3,200
🔥 512

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Pascal Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

25
🔥 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 1.0 x4 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

6.1 6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,582
🔥 1,354

Boost Clock

1,683
🔥 1,392

Memory Clock

1,376
🔥 +9% 1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

250 W
🔥 -81% 47 W

Recommended PSU

600 W
🔥 -67% 200 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

200
🔥 32

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

2.5 MB
🔥 +40,860% 1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Feb. 12, 2018 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying