Intel Arc A770 8 GB vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of Intel Arc A770 8 GB with 8 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms Intel Arc A770 8 GB by 534.88% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Intel Arc A770 8 GB

10.4

Intel Arc A770 8 GB

10.4
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +100% 8 ГБ
4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

512.0 GB/s 96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +77% 39.32 TFLOPS
22.27 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

19.66 TFLOPS
🔥 +7,148% 1,425.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +5,419% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +700% 4,096
512

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Generation 12.7 Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +55% 2,100
1,354

Boost Clock

🔥 +72% 2,400
1,392

Memory Clock

🔥 +33% 2,000
1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

225 W
🔥 -79% 47 W

Recommended PSU

550 W
🔥 -64% 200 W

Power Connector

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +700% 256
32

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying