Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of Intel Arctic Sound 2T with 16 GB HBM2e and 7,680 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms Intel Arctic Sound 2T by 341.6% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Intel Arctic Sound 2T

14.9

Intel Arctic Sound 2T

14.9
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +300% 16 ГБ
4 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM2e GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 1.23 TB/s
96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

4,096 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +24% 27.65 TFLOPS
22.27 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

13.82 TFLOPS
🔥 +10,211% 1,425.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +7,659% 3.456 TFLOPS
0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +1,400% 7,680
512

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Generation 12.5 Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 1,354

Boost Clock

No
🔥 1,392

Memory Clock

1,200
🔥 +25% 1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

500 W
🔥 -91% 47 W

Recommended PSU

900 W
🔥 -78% 200 W

Power Connector

None None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +650% 240
32

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 8 MB
1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

July 15, 2021 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying