Intel Arctic Sound-M vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of Intel Arctic Sound-M with 16 GB HBM2e and 8,192 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms Intel Arctic Sound-M by 326.13% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Intel Arctic Sound-M

15.4

Intel Arctic Sound-M

15.4
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +300% 16 ГБ
4 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM2e GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 1.23 TB/s
96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

4,096 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +32% 29.49 TFLOPS
22.27 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

14.75 TFLOPS
🔥 +9,561% 1,425.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +8,176% 3.686 TFLOPS
0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +1,500% 8,192
512

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Generation 12.5 Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 1,354

Boost Clock

No
🔥 1,392

Memory Clock

1,200
🔥 +25% 1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

500 W
🔥 -91% 47 W

Recommended PSU

900 W
🔥 -78% 200 W

Power Connector

8-pin EPS None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +700% 256
32

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 8 MB
1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Single-slot

Release Date

July 15, 2022 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying