Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

Comparison of Intel H3C XG310 with 8 GB LPDDR4X and 768 cores vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB outperforms Intel H3C XG310 by 1,434.73% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Intel H3C XG310

1.7

Intel H3C XG310

1.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

8 ГБ ×4 (32 ГБ)
🔥 +900% 80 ГБ

Memory Type

LPDDR4X HBM2e

Memory Bandwidth

68.26 GB/s ×4 (273.04 GB/s)
🔥 1.94 TB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит ×4 (512 бит) 5,120 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

3.379 TFLOPS
🔥 +2,207% 77.97 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No
🔥 311.84 TFLOPS

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No
🔥 155.92

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

1.69 TFLOPS
🔥 +1,053% 19.49 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.4224 TFLOPS
🔥 +2,207% 9.746 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

768 ×4 (3072)
🔥 +800% 6,912

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Generation 12.1 Ampere

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 108

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 8.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,050
🔥 +1% 1,065

Boost Clock

1,100
🔥 +28% 1,410

Memory Clock

🔥 +41% 2,133
1,512

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

300 W 300 W

Recommended PSU

700 W 700 W

Power Connector

1x 8-pin 8-pin EPS

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

48 ×4 (192)
🔥 +800% 432

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

1024 KB
🔥 80 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Nov. 11, 2020 June 28, 2021

Display Outputs

No outputs
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying