KFA2 GT 740 Slim OC 2 GB vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of KFA2 GT 740 Slim OC 2 GB with 2 GB GDDR5 and 384 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms KFA2 GT 740 Slim OC 2 GB by 56.71% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

KFA2 GT 740 Slim OC 2 GB

41.9

KFA2 GT 740 Slim OC 2 GB

41.9
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

2 ГБ
🔥 +100% 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

80.19 GB/s 96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 22.27 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

812.5 TFLOPS
🔥 +75% 1,425.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.03386 TFLOPS
🔥 +32% 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

384
🔥 +33% 512

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Kepler Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

3.0
🔥 6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 1,354

Boost Clock

No
🔥 1,392

Memory Clock

1,253
🔥 +20% 1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

64 W
🔥 -27% 47 W

Recommended PSU

250 W
🔥 -20% 200 W

Power Connector

None None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

32
🔥 32

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

256 KB
🔥 +300% 1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Single-slot

Release Date

May 29, 2014 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.4a

1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying