KFA2 GTX 1650 SUPER EX (1-Click OC) vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of KFA2 GTX 1650 SUPER EX (1-Click OC) with 4 GB GDDR6 and 1,280 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms KFA2 GTX 1650 SUPER EX (1-Click OC) by 1,979.43% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

KFA2 GTX 1650 SUPER EX (1-Click OC)

3.2

KFA2 GTX 1650 SUPER EX (1-Click OC)

3.2
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

192.0 GB/s 96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

8.909 TFLOPS
🔥 +150% 22.27 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

4.454 TFLOPS
🔥 +31,894% 1,425.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.1392 TFLOPS
🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

1,280
🔥 512

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Turing Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

20
🔥 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 7.5
6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,530
🔥 1,354

Boost Clock

1,740
🔥 1,392

Memory Clock

1,500
🔥 1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

100 W
🔥 -53% 47 W

Recommended PSU

300 W
🔥 -33% 200 W

Power Connector

1x 6-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

80
🔥 32

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

1024 KB
🔥 1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Nov. 22, 2019 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying