KFA2 RTX 4080 SG (1-Click OC) vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of KFA2 RTX 4080 SG (1-Click OC) with 16 GB GDDR6X and 9,728 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms KFA2 RTX 4080 SG (1-Click OC) by 220.38% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

KFA2 RTX 4080 SG (1-Click OC)

20.5

KFA2 RTX 4080 SG (1-Click OC)

20.5
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +300% 16 ГБ
4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6X GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

716.8 GB/s 96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +124% 49.9 TFLOPS
22.27 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

49.9 TFLOPS
🔥 +2,756% 1,425.0 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +1,651% 0.7797999999999999 TFLOPS
0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +1,800% 9,728
512

RT Cores

🔥 76
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Ada Lovelace Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 +1,800% 76
4

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 8.9
6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +63% 2,205
1,354

Boost Clock

🔥 +84% 2,565
1,392

Memory Clock

1,400
🔥 +7% 1,502

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

320 W
🔥 -85% 47 W

Recommended PSU

700 W
🔥 -71% 200 W

Power Connector

1x 16-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +850% 304
32

ROP

🔥 76
No

L2 Cache

🔥 64 MB
1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Triple-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Sept. 20, 2022 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying