Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

Comparison of Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M with 2 GB GDDR5 and 1,024 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M by 3,788.17% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

1.7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

1.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +100% 4 ГБ
2 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

96.13 GB/s 80.19 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 22.27 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +60,410% 1,425.0 TFLOPS
2.355 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS
73,600.0 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 512
1,024

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Pascal Maxwell 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 4
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 6.1
5.2

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +45% 1,354
935

Boost Clock

🔥 +21% 1,392
1,150

Memory Clock

🔥 +20% 1,502
1,253

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

47 W unknown

Recommended PSU

200 W No

Power Connector

None None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 32
64

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 1024 KB
1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot MXM Module

Release Date

May 21, 2020 Feb. 29, 2016

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Portable Device Dependent

Renting is cheaper than buying