Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort vs Matrox LUMA A310F

Comparison of Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores vs Matrox LUMA A310F with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms Matrox LUMA A310F by 2,886.82% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox LUMA A310F

2.2

Matrox LUMA A310F

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

96.13 GB/s 124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +262% 22.27 TFLOPS
6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +46,287% 1,425.0 TFLOPS
3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS
🔥 +1,624% 0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

512
🔥 +50% 768

RT Cores

No
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Pascal Generation 12.7

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 4
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

6.1 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,354
🔥 +48% 2,000

Boost Clock

1,392
🔥 +44% 2,000

Memory Clock

1,502
🔥 +29% 1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -6% 47 W
50 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -20% 200 W
250 W

Power Connector

None None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

32 32

ROP

No
🔥 6

L2 Cache

1024 KB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Single-slot

Release Date

May 21, 2020 April 27, 2023

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

Renting is cheaper than buying