NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs Sapphire Tri-X R9 FURY

Comparison of NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores vs Sapphire Tri-X R9 FURY with 4 GB HBM and 3,584 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB outperforms Sapphire Tri-X R9 FURY by 262.52% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Sapphire Tri-X R9 FURY

7.1

Sapphire Tri-X R9 FURY

7.1

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +1,900% 80 ГБ
4 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM2e HBM

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 1.94 TB/s
512.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

5,120 бит 4,096 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +988% 77.97 TFLOPS
7.168 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

🔥 311.84 TFLOPS
No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

🔥 155.92
No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +172% 19.49 TFLOPS
7.168 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +2,075% 9.746 TFLOPS
0.448 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +93% 6,912
3,584

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Ampere GCN 3.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 108
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

8.0 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 1,065
No

Boost Clock

🔥 1,410
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +202% 1,512
500

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

300 W
🔥 -8% 275 W

Recommended PSU

700 W
🔥 -14% 600 W

Power Connector

8-pin EPS 2x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +93% 432
224

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 +3,900% 80 MB
2 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

June 28, 2021 July 10, 2015

Display Outputs

No outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying