NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs SPARKLE Arc A310 ECO

Comparison of NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 ECO with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB outperforms SPARKLE Arc A310 ECO by 1,065.0% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

SPARKLE Arc A310 ECO

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 ECO

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +1,900% 80 ГБ
4 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM2e GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 1.94 TB/s
124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

5,120 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +1,169% 77.97 TFLOPS
6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

🔥 311.84 TFLOPS
No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

🔥 155.92
No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +534% 19.49 TFLOPS
3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +1,169% 9.746 TFLOPS
0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +800% 6,912
768

RT Cores

No
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Ampere Generation 12.7

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 108
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

8.0 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,065
🔥 +88% 2,000

Boost Clock

1,410
🔥 +42% 2,000

Memory Clock

1,512
🔥 +28% 1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

300 W
🔥 -83% 50 W

Recommended PSU

700 W
🔥 -64% 250 W

Power Connector

8-pin EPS None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +1,250% 432
32

ROP

No
🔥 6

L2 Cache

🔥 +1,900% 80 MB
4 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

June 28, 2021 April 27, 2023

Display Outputs

No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x HDMI 2.1
2x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

Renting is cheaper than buying