Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

Comparison of Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe with 16 GB GDDR6 and 1,280 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms NVIDIA A16 PCIe by 1,567.77% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

65.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA A16 PCIe

3.9

NVIDIA A16 PCIe

3.9

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 ГБ
🔥 +300% 16 ГБ ×4 (64 ГБ)

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

96.13 GB/s 200.1 GB/s ×4 (800.4 GB/s)

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 128 бит ×4 (512 бит)

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +396% 22.27 TFLOPS
4.493 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +31,616% 1,425.0 TFLOPS
4.493 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.044539999999999996 TFLOPS
🔥 +215% 0.1404 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

512
🔥 +150% 1,280 ×4 (5120)

RT Cores

No
🔥 10 ×4 (40)

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Pascal Ampere

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

4
🔥 +150% 10

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

6.1
🔥 8.6

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +3% 1,354
1,312

Boost Clock

1,392
🔥 +26% 1,755

Memory Clock

1,502
🔥 +4% 1,563

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -81% 47 W
250 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -67% 200 W
600 W

Power Connector

None 8-pin EPS

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

32
🔥 +25% 40 ×4 (160)

ROP

No
🔥 10 ×4 (40)

L2 Cache

1024 KB
🔥 2 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

May 21, 2020 April 12, 2021

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying