NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB vs ZOTAC GTX 770

Comparison of NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores vs ZOTAC GTX 770 with 2 GB GDDR5 and 1,536 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB outperforms ZOTAC GTX 770 by 851.84% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

ZOTAC GTX 770

2.7

ZOTAC GTX 770

2.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +3,900% 80 ГБ
2 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM2e GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 2.04 TB/s
224.4 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

5,120 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 77.97 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

🔥 311.84 TFLOPS
No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

🔥 155.92
No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +472% 19.49 TFLOPS
3.41 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +6,759% 9.746 TFLOPS
0.1421 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +350% 6,912
1,536

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Ampere Kepler

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 108
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 8.0
3.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +9% 1,155
1,058

Boost Clock

🔥 +27% 1,410
1,110

Memory Clock

🔥 1,593
1,753

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

400 W
🔥 -42% 230 W

Recommended PSU

800 W
🔥 -31% 550 W

Power Connector

None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +238% 432
128

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 40 MB
512 KB

Additional

Slots

🔥 SXM Module
Dual-slot

Release Date

Aug. 11, 2022 May 30, 2013

Display Outputs

No outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying